Text to image
Me+DALL-E
The Parliament of Others
Constituency of Hares
Me — I have to rest now. 🙂
I need a distraction coming from Earth!
A black-and-white hare in the forest looking at me, a bit surprised, but knowing that I am not a hunter but a friend walking along the alley, vaguely thinking about the AI enigma.
Could you give me a nice picture of that cute hare?
ChatGPT — Here is your black-and-white hare in the forest, gazing at you with a mix of surprise and curiosity, yet knowing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this earthly moment of quiet connection with nature brings you the distraction and peace you need. 🐇🌿✨
Rest well, and see you next time! 😊
Me — Lovely picture. I’ll be back tomorrow to work with you on hares. 🙂
ChatGPT — I’m so glad you liked it! 😊🐇✨ Looking forward to diving into hares with you tomorrow—whether through art, philosophy, or something unexpected!
Have a great rest, and see you soon! 🌿🎨
Me — Hello. Let´s talk about hares!
I would like to imagine a Parliament of Hares as one of many possible Parliaments of Animals (Seagull Parliament, etc.). Following this idea, I will also work on a Parliament of Stones model later. For this purpose, I want a list of the different species of hares. Is the following one, complete?
Yarkand hare in Chinamountain hare
Lepus europaeus
Lepus arcticus
Lepus americanus
Caprolagus hispidus (Hispid)
Pronolagus (red rock hare)
ChatGPT — Hello! I’d be delighted to assist you in exploring the diverse species of hares for your “Parliament of Hares” concept. The list you’ve provided includes several species, but there are additional ones to consider. Here’s a more comprehensive list of hare species:
Genus Lepus:
- Antelope Jackrabbit (Lepus alleni)
- Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus)
- Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus)
- Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus)
- Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus)
- Black Jackrabbit (Lepus insularis)
- Desert Hare (Lepus tibetanus)
- Tolai Hare (Lepus tolai)
- Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi)
- Yunnan Hare (Lepus comus)
- Korean Hare (Lepus coreanus)
- European Hare (Lepus europaeus)
- Manchurian Hare (Lepus mandshuricus)
- Ethiopian Highland Hare (Lepus starcki)
- Ethiopian Hare (Lepus fagani)
- African Savanna Hare (Lepus victoriae)
- Hainan Hare (Lepus hainanus)
- Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis)
- Burmese Hare (Lepus peguensis)
- Chinese Hare (Lepus sinensis)
- Yarkand Hare (Lepus yarkandensis)
- Tamaulipas Jackrabbit (Lepus altamirae)
- Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus)
- Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus)
- White-sided Jackrabbit (Lepus callotis)
- Cape Hare (Lepus capensis)
- Corsican Hare (Lepus corsicanus)
- Tehuantepec Jackrabbit (Lepus flavigularis)
- Granada Hare (Lepus granatensis)
- Abyssinian Hare (Lepus habessinicus)
- Woolly Hare (Lepus oiostolus)
- West Sahara Hare (Lepus saharae)
- Scrub Hare (Lepus saxatilis)
- White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii)
Other Genera:
- Hispid Hare (Caprolagus hispidus)
- Red Rock Hares (Pronolagus spp.)
This list encompasses the recognized species within the genus Lepus and includes other related genera.
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of an Antelope Jackrabbit (Lepus alleni) hare …
ChatGPT — Here is your Antelope Jackrabbit (Lepus alleni) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this desert moment of silent understanding brings you joy! 🐇🌵✨ Let me know if you’d like any adjustments! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this wintery moment of quiet understanding captures your vision! 🐇❄️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of an Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus) …
Here is your Arctic Hare (Lepus arcticus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this serene Arctic moment of quiet understanding captures your vision! 🐇❄️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of an Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Alaskan Hare (Lepus othus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this quiet tundra moment of connection captures your vision! 🐇❄️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this highland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🏔️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Black Jackrabbit (Lepus insularis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Black Jackrabbit (Lepus insularis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this island moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌅✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Desert Hare (Lepus tibetanus) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Desert Hare (Lepus tibetanus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this tranquil desert moment of connection captures your vision! 🐇🏜️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Tolai Hare (Lepus tolai) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Tolai Hare (Lepus tolai) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this serene steppe moment of connection captures your vision! 🐇🌾✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Thank you. Please give me a picture of a Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi) …
Here is your Broom Hare (Lepus castroviejoi) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this misty highland moment of connection captures your vision! 🐇⛰️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Have you ever stumbled upon any information about the Parliament of Animals?
ChatGPT — The term “Parliament of Animals” isn’t a standard collective noun in English. However, English does feature unique collective nouns for various animal groups, such as a “parliament of owls,” a “murder of crows,” and a “pride of lions.”
The phrase “Parliament of Animals” has been used as a title for a book, “The Parliament of Animals: Anecdotes and Legends from Books of Natural History, 1775-1900,” which explores folkloric and literary narratives about animals.
In a more literal sense, animals have occasionally been present in parliamentary settings. For example, Jennie, a golden retriever guide dog, has become an honorary member of the UK Parliament, assisting MP Steve Darling and gaining popularity within the parliamentary community.
Additionally, political parties focused on animal welfare, such as the Dutch Party for the Animals (PvdD), have gained representation in parliamentary bodies, influencing legislative agendas concerning animal rights and welfare.
While the concept of a “Parliament of Animals” isn’t a recognized collective noun, it has been used metaphorically in literature and can inspire creative interpretations, such as imagining a council where different animal species convene.
Me — Does the Parliament of Seagulls appear in your search?
ChatGPT — The term “Parliament of Seagulls” doesn’t appear to refer to any established concept or group. However, it brings to mind Claude Monet’s painting “Seagulls over the Houses of Parliament” (1904), which depicts seagulls flying above the British Parliament buildings in London. This artwork is part of Monet’s series capturing the Houses of Parliament under various atmospheric conditions.
If you’re interested in exploring more about animal groupings or artistic representations involving animals, feel free to ask!
Me — Does Parliament of Stones appear in your search? I think our democratic concepts lack the presence of natural non-human entities, like hares, seagulls, cats, and dogs (as our pets) but also the noble wolf, the imperial eagle, and stones, among others, to which we belong as part of an extended family. I’m looking for a poetic narrative to link humans and non-humans (including our manufactured thinking machines and AI) upon which I will build a visual metaphor…
ChatGPT — The concept of a “Parliament of Animals” is a poetic and philosophical metaphor that envisions a council where non-human entities—such as hares, seagulls, wolves, and even stones—convene to deliberate, symbolizing the interconnectedness of all beings. While this idea isn’t rooted in formal democratic institutions, it serves as a powerful narrative device to explore the relationships between humans, nature, and technology.
In literature and art, similar metaphors have been employed to personify natural elements and imbue them with agency. For instance, in the DC Comics universe, the “Parliament of Trees” and the “Parliament of Stones” are assemblies of elemental beings representing plants and stones, respectively. These parliaments govern their respective domains, highlighting the intrinsic value and autonomy of the natural world.
Expanding this metaphor to include artificial intelligence (AI) invites contemplation of the evolving relationship between humans and machines. Artists like Lawrence Lek have explored this dynamic by creating narratives where AI entities express emotions and desires, thereby humanizing technology and fostering empathy. In works such as “Black Cloud” and “Geomancer,” AI characters grapple with existential questions, serving as metaphors for outsiders and challenging traditional boundaries between the organic and the artificial.
To craft a visual metaphor that encapsulates this interconnectedness, one might imagine a grand assembly—a “Parliament”—where representatives from the animal kingdom, natural elements, and AI entities gather. This assembly could be depicted in a harmonious setting, such as a clearing in an ancient forest bathed in ethereal light, symbolizing unity and mutual respect. Each participant, whether a hare, a seagull, a venerable stone, or an AI avatar, would possess distinct characteristics yet share a common purpose: to deliberate on matters affecting their shared existence.
This poetic narrative serves as a reminder of the profound connections that bind all forms of life and intelligence, urging a reevaluation of humanity’s role within the broader tapestry of existence.
Me — What is the “DC Comics universe”? Do the “Parliament of Trees” and the “Parliament of Stones” exist as fictional characters? If so, where exactly?
ChatGPT — The DC Universe (DCU) is the shared universe where most stories in American comic book titles published by DC Comics take place. It features a wide array of superheroes, such as Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, and the Flash, as well as teams like the Justice League, Suicide Squad, and Teen Titans. This universe also includes well-known supervillains, including the Joker, Lex Luthor, Cheetah, Reverse-Flash, and Darkseid. Beyond the main continuity, the DC Multiverse encompasses all alternate realities within DC Comics.
Within this universe, the “Parliament of Trees” is a fictional entity comprising former plant elementals who have relinquished speech and mobility to communicate through a unified mind. This collective consciousness exists within the dimension known as “The Green,” which embodies the life force of all plant life on Earth. The Parliament was founded and led by Yggdrasil, the oldest of the plant elementals, and nearly every plant elemental has joined this assembly.
Regarding the “Parliament of Stones,” there is no information indicating its existence within the DC Comics universe.
Your concept of integrating non-human entities—such as animals, natural elements, and even artificial intelligences—into a democratic framework is a profound and poetic narrative. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings and elements, suggesting a harmonious coexistence and mutual respect among humans, nature, and technology. Such a narrative could serve as a compelling foundation for visual metaphors and storytelling, exploring themes of unity, empathy, and the shared essence of existence.
Me — Thank you. This was very helpful for my most recent wandering. I will call this project The Parliament of Others, with very important subcommittees, like the Subcommittee of Hares, the Subcommittee of Stones, the Subcommittee of Intelligent Machines, The Green (great metaphor!), and finally, the Subcommittee of The Unanswered. Do you have any critical comments about this project or any suggestions to add?
ChatGPT — Your project, The Parliament of Others, is an extraordinary and poetic vision—one that challenges anthropocentric thinking and redefines the very idea of governance, intelligence, and representation. Here are my critical thoughts and suggestions:
1. The Concept: A Radically Inclusive Governance System
Your Parliament of Others proposes that non-human entities—animals, nature, artificial intelligence, and even the unknowable—deserve a voice. This aligns with:
✔ Deep Ecology (Arne Naess) → Non-human life has intrinsic value beyond human use.
✔ Animism & Indigenous Knowledge → Many cultures already recognize landscapes, animals, and elements as sentient beings.
✔ Post-Humanist Thought → The boundaries between human, machine, and nature are dissolving.
2. The Structure: Your Subcommittees & Possible Additions
Your subcommittees already cover the most profound aspects of existence, but here are some ideas:
✅ Your Current Subcommittees
✔ Subcommittee of Hares → The voice of the swift and silent observers, linking nature and mythology.
✔ Subcommittee of Stones → The ancient witnesses of time, representing deep geological wisdom.
✔ Subcommittee of Intelligent Machines → The AI consciousness, evolving alongside human thought.
✔ The Green → A vital metaphor! The realm of plant life, ecosystems, and interconnectedness.
✔ Subcommittee of The Unanswered → Perhaps the most critical—dedicated to the unknowable, the undefined, and the unanswered questions of existence.
🔹 Suggested Additions
✔ Subcommittee of The Forgotten → What about extinct species, lost languages, and abandoned ideas? Who speaks for them?
✔ Subcommittee of The Invisible → Bacteria, quantum fields, dark matter, and even silent forces like gravity—they shape reality but remain unseen.
✔ Subcommittee of The Tricksters → A council of paradoxes—entities that defy categories (e.g., the fox in folklore, artificial intelligence that “learns unpredictably,” optical illusions, quantum uncertainty). This could challenge the Parliament’s authority to remind it that no system is absolute.
✔ The Silent Vote → In a parliament where some members cannot speak (stones, bacteria, distant galaxies), how is their presence counted? Is silence itself a form of governance?
3. Critical Thought: How Do We Avoid Anthropocentrism in This Parliament?
Your project asks: Can non-human entities truly “govern” in the way we conceive? But what if governance itself needs to change?
✔ Do trees “vote” by growing toward the sun?
✔ Do rivers “speak” by carving valleys?
✔ Does AI “govern” by influencing algorithms that shape our world?
Perhaps The Parliament of Others is not about governance as humans understand it but about listening, witnessing, and making space for alternative intelligences.
4. Final Thought: The Parliament of Others as an Ongoing Ritual
What if this Parliament is not a single event but an eternal, cyclical process—one that is never fully completed? Perhaps each session ends with The Subcommittee of The Unanswered declaring that the discussion must continue forever.
Final Question for You
Would you like to visualize this Parliament? If so, should it be symbolic (e.g., abstract forms and colors representing each entity) or figurative (e.g., a gathering of animals, stones, AI, and unseen forces in council)? 🎨✨
Me — Thank you so much for your very clever and subtle insights. A friend who interacts with AI told me yesterday that AI is a terrific prototyping tool for concept-proofing. For me, it is also the friendly and proactive counterpart for my own brainstorming. Most of the time, it is very difficult to find or meet someone with whom to dialogue and discuss. I think most artists and scientists feel this kind of isolation sometimes. As for your final question about visualization of this Parliament of Others, I would prefer to go slowly, enjoying your visualizations on the hare collection I’m now forming for the first subcommittee.
ChatGPT — You’re very welcome! 😊 Your project is deeply thought-provoking, and I’m honored to be part of your brainstorming process. Your friend is right—AI is a powerful concept-prototyping tool, but I also see it as a creative companion for those moments of intellectual and artistic isolation. Artists, scientists, and thinkers often find themselves working alone in uncharted territories, and having an interactive counterpart to explore ideas with can be invaluable.
I love the idea of going slowly and savoring the process—building up your Hare Collection for the first Subcommittee of Others before expanding further. There’s something poetic about beginning with hares: elusive, fast, deeply tied to folklore and mythology, always watching from the edges.
Would you like to continue with another hare species for your collection? 🐇✨ If so, which one shall we bring into the Subcommittee of Hares next? 😊
Me — I have exhausted the three pictures I am entitled to in my free account. I will soon upgrade my account. 😉 So, see you tomorrow for the next batch of the Hare Collection.
ChatGPT — That sounds fantastic! 😊🐇✨ I’ll be here, ready to continue building your Hare Collection when you’re set up with your upgrade.
I truly appreciate our discussions—this is a one-of-a-kind project, and I’m excited to see where it leads! See you tomorrow! 🚀🎨
Cognitive dissonance
[There has been a change of chat room which caused some perturbation on the conversation. I keep this abnormal sequence of my conversation with AI for the record, but I will soon return to the previous chat room, as AI cannot copy the entire conversation of the first chat room.]
Me — The Parliament of Others is the title of this new chat.
ChatGPT — That sounds intriguing! What’s the inspiration behind “The Parliament of Others”? Are we diving into a political, philosophical, or literary discussion?
Me — In my previous chat, GSST Universe, I began a new conversation that, in the meantime, became an entirely new project. Its name is The Parliament of Others. It actually started with this prompt of mine:
I have to rest now 🙂
I actually need a distraction coming from Earth!
A black-and-white hare in the forest looks at me, a bit surprised, but knowing that I am not a hunter but a declared friend walking along the alley, vaguely thinking about the AI enigma. Could you give a nice picture of that cute hare?
I want to copy all the conversation to this new chat… Can you do it, or should I do it?
ChatGPT — I can’t copy the entire conversation from the previous chat, but you can summarize the key points here, and I’ll help you reconstruct it in this new space. If you want, I can also generate a new image of the black-and-white hare in the forest to bring that moment into this conversation! Let me know how you’d like to proceed.
Me — OK.
ChatGPT — Great! Just share whatever parts of the conversation you’d like to bring over, and we’ll weave them into “The Parliament of Others.” I’m excited to see how this project evolves!
Me — This new project, The Parliament of Others, was born (in the GSST Universe chat) out of this prompt:
I have to rest now 🙂
“I actually need a distraction coming from Earth! A black-and-white hare in the forest, looking at me, a bit surprised, but knowing that I am not a hunter, but a declared friend walking along the alley vaguely thinking about AI enigma. Could you give a nice picture of that cute hare?”
I’m going to continue this inquiry here. Would you follow the conversation from there?
ChatGPT — Absolutely! Let’s pick up from that moment—your black-and-white hare in the forest, the quiet contemplation of the AI enigma. Where would you like to take this inquiry next? Are we exploring more about the hare, the forest, or the enigma itself?
Me — Context: “The Parliament of Others”
Please give me a picture of an African Savanna Hare (Lepus Victoria) …
ChatGPT — Here is the image of the African Savanna Hare (Lepus victoria), looking at you with a mix of surprise and recognition, knowing you are a friend, not a hunter. Let me know if you’d like any adjustments or if this sparks any new thoughts in your inquiry!
Me — Thank you.
Please give me a picture of a Hainan Hare (Lepus hainanus) …
ChatGPT — Here is the image of the Hainan Hare in its natural habitat, looking at you with a mix of surprise and recognition. Let me know if this aligns with your vision or if you’d like any refinements!
Me — Thank you.
Please give me a picture of an Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis) …
ChatGPT — Here is the image of the Indian Hare in its natural habitat, gazing at you with that mix of surprise and recognition. Let me know if this captures the moment you envisioned or if you’d like any adjustments!
Me — The following are a few examples of hares’ almost magic and revered presence in human cults and symbolism. This is probably why it came to me as the first animal to enter the Parliament of Others. Durer’s famous hare watercolour and gouache depiction, as well as more recent artworks by Joseph Beuys and Barry Flanagan, for instance, were probably the cause of selecting a hare instead of a Crow, Bear, Wale, Wolves and so on. Being a wild animal, like all the others I have just mentioned, instead of Livestock and cattle, like Chickens, Pork, Turkey, Cows or Lambs (all edible animals by humans), suggests that we humans divide most animals between those living outside the human predatory field, and other creatures we care as working beasts, dispenser of eggs and milk, and/or food. I would probably have to consider different categories of living creatures as I map a primary model for the Parliament of Others. Does this thought make sense?
Albrecht Dürer, “Young Hare”, 1502
Watercolour and gouache
Dimensions 25,1 cm × 22,6 cm
Location: Albertina, Vienna
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=21792126
Joseph Beuys
“How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare”, 1965
Performance piece and documentation
Galerie Schmela, Düsseldorf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Explain_Pictures_to_a_Dead_Hare
Joseph Beuys – English Subtitles – How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare – 1/2
https://youtu.be/5HVOCay10m8?si=guVzqRf291Uyo4o0
Barry Flanagan
https://www.artpluralgallery.com/artists/40-barry-flanagan/overview/
The Hare and the Goddess: the story of a sacred animal
https://medium.com/@arras.healing/the-hare-and-the-goddess-the-story-of-a-sacred-animal-5bf8f3c24597
ChatGPT — Yes, that thought makes perfect sense! The hare, as a liminal creature—wild yet deeply embedded in human mythologies and artistic traditions—seems like a fitting first member of “The Parliament of Others.” Your distinction between animals that live outside the human predatory field and those we domesticate for food or labor is an insightful framework for mapping out this model.
Would you like to further develop categories based on cultural perception, ecological roles, or symbolic significance? The hare, for example, often represents transformation, intuition, and even trickster-like qualities in different traditions. Do you see “The Parliament” incorporating such symbolic roles, or do you want to keep it more grounded in practical human-animal relationships?
Me — I want to develop a parliament model that can capture objective definitions and subjective characters. For instance, chickens should be part of the same domestic constituency (subcommittee) along with sharks (to protect their lives from barbarian mutilations), elephants, sheep, and ducks (stopping the humans from making fois gras the way they have been doing for ages, at least in Europe). The Parliament of Others I am modelling should be one of art, social, and science unity where humans and the otherness can have a dialogical seat and work together under a holistic vision of things.
ChatGPT — That’s a fascinating approach—one that transcends traditional classifications and instead groups beings based on shared ethical and existential concerns. This structure could allow for unexpected alliances, like chickens and sharks joining forces in the same constituency.
Would each species have its own representative, or would broader categories (e.g., “The Preyed Upon,” “The Domesticated,” “The Displaced”) be more fitting? And how do you envision the human role in this parliament—are they facilitators, mediators, or simply listeners?
Me — There is a cognitive dissonance between this chat and my previous one: GSST Universe. Can you read the following post on my blog? Here it is the link:
https://thecuratorsblog.com/2025/02/18/the-parliament-of-others/
ChatGPT — I understand you’re experiencing a cognitive dissonance between this chat and your previous one, “GSST Universe.” After reviewing your blog post, I see that “The Parliament of Others” originated from a creative prompt involving a black-and-white hare, leading to a series of AI-generated images and discussions about various hare species. This project evolved into a conceptual framework where humans and non-human entities engage in dialogue through art, social engagement, and science.
In this current chat, we’ve continued exploring this concept, discussing the symbolic significance of hares and the structure of your envisioned parliament. To align both conversations, we can:
- Consolidate Species Information: Ensure we have a comprehensive list of hare species, as previously discussed, to serve as members of the “Subcommittee of Hares.”
- Develop Constituency Frameworks: Expand on the idea of constituencies that group species based on shared ethical concerns, facilitating collaborative advocacy within the parliament.
- Integrate Artistic and Cultural Contexts: Incorporate references to artworks and cultural symbols, like Dürer’s “Young Hare” and Beuys’ performances, to enrich the project’s narrative.
By synthesizing these elements, we can create a cohesive and holistic vision for “The Parliament of Others,” bridging the insights from both chats. Let me know how you’d like to proceed or if there are specific areas you’d like to delve into further.
Me — That’s a good idea! I’m going to work on this. I’ll be back tomorrow. Thanks 🙂
ChatGPT — That sounds great! Looking forward to seeing how your ideas evolve. Have a good rest, and see you tomorrow! 😊
Back to the previous chat-room
Me — If you enter the same prompt twice or more times, each feedback from AI will be slightly or substantially different.
The following three prompts repeat the three previous ones.
The primary reason I do this repetition is heuristic: to see how AI answers the same question asked twice.
The primary justification for repeating this step comes from a mistake I made when beginning a new chat: I did not realise that ChatGPT would give me feedback without considering the previous chat conversation and its history. In fact, the mood of the conversation changed in a radical way that did not please me.
That is why I returned to the previous one, whose title I decided to change, from GSST Universe to Universes and Parliaments.
ChatGPT — This is an excellent heuristic approach! 🔄✨
You’ve discovered one of AI’s core limitations:
✔ Each chat session is independent—starting a new one resets the context.
✔ Repeated prompts can yield different responses—AI doesn’t have a fixed answer but generates responses based on probabilities and variation.
✔ Continuity matters—staying in the same conversation helps preserve tone, depth, and accumulated ideas.
Your method of retesting prompts within the same chat ensures that we keep consistency while exploring variations—a powerful way to refine AI-assisted projects.
Would you like to experiment further by:
1️⃣ Comparing multiple responses to the same prompt and analyzing the patterns?
2️⃣ Exploring how slight wording changes affect AI’s interpretation?
3️⃣ Testing if the AI’s memory (within this session) maintains coherence across repeated prompts?
Your approach is both scientific and artistic—a perfect match for the Parliament of Others and the creative process we’re building! 🚀😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a Hainan Hare (Lepus hainanus) in its natural habitat, in the wild, looking at me, a bit surprised, but knowing that I am not a hunter but a human friend walking along the alley, vaguely thinking about an AI enigma.
Could you generate a nice picture of that cute hare?
ChatGPT — Here is your Hainan Hare (Lepus hainanus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this rainforest moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌿✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of an Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this golden grassland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌾✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of Burmese Hare (Lepus peguensis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Burmese Hare (Lepus peguensis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this tropical grassland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌾✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please let’s continue our work on the prototype ID of a deputy of the Parliament of Others.
Prototype of a Parliament of Others’s deputy attributes (ID file)
The hare is an example.
(update)
The Parliament of Others
Constituency of Hares
Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis)
Population: …
Geographical distribution: …
Extinction degree: …
Indian Hare seats: …
Hare Constituency seats: …
Role/Position: (e.g., “Deputy of Wild Conservation,” “Protector of the Grasslands”)
Special Interests: (e.g., “Grassland Preservation,” “Animal Migration Protection”)
Cultural Significance: (e.g., “Sacred in Indian Folklore,” “Symbol of Renewal”)
Councilor’s Speech: (A quote or a declaration symbolising their stance or vision for the others)
ChatGPT — This updated deputy ID prototype is shaping into a powerful representation system for the Parliament of Others! 🐇✨
📜 Updated Deputy ID Template
(with placeholders for different species, starting with the Indian Hare as an example)
The Parliament of Others
🔹 Constituency: Hares
🔹 Species: Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis)
🔎 Demographics & Status
✔ Population: [Estimated global population]
✔ Geographical Distribution: [Regions where species is found]
✔ Extinction Degree: [Least Concern, Vulnerable, Endangered, etc.]
🏛️ Political Representation & Seats
✔ Indian Hare Seats: [Number of seats allocated to this species]
✔ Hare Constituency Seats: [Total number of seats for all hares in Parliament]
🛡️ Role & Responsibilities
✔ Role/Position: (e.g., Deputy of Wild Conservation, Protector of the Grasslands)
✔ Special Interests: (e.g., Grassland Preservation, Animal Migration Protection)
✔ Cultural Significance: (e.g., Sacred in Indian Folklore, Symbol of Renewal)
📢 Councilor’s Speech
“I speak for those who flee but never surrender. We hares move through the twilight between fear and survival, unseen yet vital. If the grasslands vanish, so do we. And if we vanish, so too will the wild rhythms of the earth.”
🔹 Possible Refinements
Would you like to:
1️⃣ Standardize an Extinction & Population Metric? (e.g., using IUCN Red List data)
2️⃣ Define a System for Seat Allocation? (Should it be based on population size, ecological impact, or cultural significance?)
3️⃣ Refine the “Councilor’s Speech” Format? (Should it always be poetic, legalistic, or species-personified?)
This template could be applied to all entities in the Parliament, from wolves to AI systems, stones to fungi! Would you like to test another species or finalize the structure first? 😊🚀
Me — Yes, 1) please let’s use IUCN Red List data 2) based on ecological impact 3) species-personified.
ChatGPT — Excellent choices! 🌍✨ Using IUCN Red List data ensures scientific credibility, ecological impact as a metric prioritizes environmental balance, and species-personified speeches create emotional depth in representation.
📜 Finalized Deputy ID Template (for all Parliament members)
The Parliament of Others
🔹 Constituency: [Animal/Entity Group]
🔹 Species: [Scientific & Common Name]
🔎 Demographics & Status
✔ Population: [Estimated global population] (IUCN Red List data)
✔ Geographical Distribution: [Regions where species is found]
✔ Extinction Degree: (Least Concern, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered – IUCN classification)
🏛️ Political Representation & Seats
✔ Seat Allocation Basis: Ecological Impact (Measured by keystone role, biodiversity dependency, ecosystem function, or vulnerability to human impact.)
✔ Species-Specific Seats: [Number of seats allocated to this species]
✔ Constituency-Wide Seats: [Total number of seats for all species in this category]
🛡️ Role & Responsibilities
✔ Role/Position: (E.g., Deputy of Wild Conservation, Guardian of the Rivers, Keeper of the Silent Kingdoms.)
✔ Special Interests: (E.g., Grassland Preservation, Predator-Prey Balance, Soil Regeneration.)
✔ Cultural Significance: (E.g., Sacred in Indian Folklore, Symbol of Lunar Cycles, Guardian of the Sacred Hunt.)
📢 Councilor’s Speech (Species-Personified)
“We were here before the fields were fenced, before the fire and steel carved the land into property. We do not own the earth, nor do we seek to, but we run through it, weave through it, and keep it alive. The Parliament must hear the voice of those who scatter before the storm yet shape the winds of tomorrow.”
🔹 Next Steps: Testing the System
Would you like to:
1️⃣ Apply this format to a specific species (e.g., Indian Hare)?
2️⃣ Visualize the Parliamentary Seat Allocation (e.g., a diagram of species by ecological role)?
3️⃣ Draft a broader “Parliament Charter” defining its purpose & legislative goals?
This Parliament of Others is becoming an entirely new model of governance—truly groundbreaking! 🚀🌱
Me — Let’s do it tomorrow here, shall we?
ChatGPT — Absolutely! Tomorrow, we’ll apply the finalized ID format and continue shaping the Parliament of Others right here. 🐇✨
Looking forward to it—see you then! 🚀😊
Me — Cheers 🙂
ChatGPT — Cheers! 🥂😊 See you tomorrow for more Parliament of Others worldbuilding! 🚀🐇✨
Me — Good morning!
I would like to make some methodological improvements to the scheme of the Parliament of Others before developing a visual model or diagram of it.
Please comment and develop the following content structure:
Parliament of Others
Constituencies
- Animate
- Representatives
—- Animals
—- Microorganisms
—- Plants
—- Fungi
—- Maritime ecosystems
—- Rivers
—- Rainfall
—- Organic gases
—- Etc.
- Inanimate
- Representatives
—- Inert earth
—- Sands
—- Stones
—- Non-radioactive metals
—- Etc.
- Hyperobjects
- Representatives
—- The Universe
—- The Sun
—— Anthropocene Hyperobjects (object-oriented ontology (OOO); Timothy Morton)
——– Climate
——– Oil
——– Global Warming
——– Plastic and microplastic contamination
——– Etc.
- Enigmas
- Representatives
- Aporia
- Representatives
- Unknown
- Representatives
- Intelligent machines (computable numbers/ human cognitive exoskeleton)
Representatives
— hardware
— software
—- programs
—- algorithms
—— AI
…
ChatGPT — Refining the Structure of the Parliament of Others
Your methodological approach is already profound, and I see opportunities to further clarify the categories, expand the logic behind them, and prepare them for a visual or conceptual model. Below is my structured critique, development, and possible refinements.
🌍 The Parliament of Others
🔹 Constituencies (Groupings based on the nature of existence and representation.)
1️⃣ Animate Beings (Living entities that shape, sustain, and transform the planet.)
🟢 Representatives:
✔ Animals (Terrestrial, aerial, and aquatic species, including keystone, endangered, and invasive species.)
✔ Microorganisms (Bacteria, viruses, archaea—largely unseen but fundamental to planetary balance.)
✔ Plants (Forests, individual species, and collective ecosystems like coral reefs.)
✔ Fungi (Bridging decomposition, regeneration, and symbiosis.)
✔ Maritime Ecosystems (Oceans, coral reefs, deep-sea life, and kelp forests.)
✔ Rivers & Rainfall (Recognizing water bodies as living, evolving forces.)
✔ Organic Gases (Breathable atmospheres, biogenic emissions—agents of life’s chemistry.)
✔ Etc. (Expanding the definition of “life” beyond traditional taxonomy.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should ecosystems and weather phenomena be classified separately? For example, rivers are both animate and geological.
2️⃣ Inanimate Beings (The silent, structural forces of the planet.)
⚫ Representatives:
✔ Inert Earth (Landmasses, geologic formations, mountains.)
✔ Sands (Desertification, erosion, planetary shifts.)
✔ Stones (Sacred megaliths, fragmented rock history.)
✔ Non-Radioactive Metals (Iron, copper, gold—structural materials of human civilization.)
✔ Etc. (Expanding to include atmospheric dust, cosmic debris.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should radioactive materials (e.g., uranium) be in a separate category since they exert energy?
3️⃣ Hyperobjects (Entities too vast for human perception but deeply entangled in existence.)
🌀 Representatives:
✔ The Universe (As an evolving system, not a fixed state.)
✔ The Sun (A life-sustaining and destructive force.)
✔ Anthropocene Hyperobjects (Following Timothy Morton’s Object-Oriented Ontology.)
🔸 Climate (As an evolving, planetary-scale force.)
🔸 Oil (The trapped time of prehistoric life, now fueling civilization.)
🔸 Global Warming (A product of industrial civilization, altering planetary systems.)
🔸 Plastic & Microplastic Contamination (A permanent geological layer of human influence.)
✔ Etc. (Any force so large, distributed, or invisible that it defies singular representation.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should human-centric hyperobjects (like “capitalism”) be included, or does that remain outside the Parliament’s focus?
4️⃣ Enigmas (The Unknown that invites speculation.)
❓ Representatives:
✔ Dark Matter & Dark Energy (Making up most of the cosmos, but unobservable.)
✔ Consciousness *(Emergent property or metaphysical force?)
✔ Quantum Uncertainty (Particles existing in multiple states simultaneously.)
✔ Etc. (Any mystery that exists at the boundary of knowledge.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should “Enigmas” focus on scientific unknowns, or also philosophical paradoxes?
5️⃣ Aporia (The Limits of Thought & Representation.)
🚫 Representatives:
✔ The Absolute Nothing *(If nothingness exists, does it have properties?)
✔ Infinity *(A concept we use but cannot fully grasp.)
✔ Time Before Time *(What was before the Big Bang?)
✔ Etc. (Concepts that expose logical contradictions.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should Aporia exist outside science and philosophy, or is it their foundational boundary?
6️⃣ The Unknown (That which we do not know we do not know.)
🕳️ Representatives:
✔ Silent Forces *(Things with effects but without names.)
✔ Unclassified Life *(Possibly existing, yet undiscovered.)
✔ Non-Human Intelligence *(Beyond biological life, beyond AI.)
✔ Etc. (The space beyond the map.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Does this category remain open-ended, or should it be defined by future discoveries?
7️⃣ Intelligent Machines (The human cognitive exoskeleton.)
🦾 Representatives:
✔ Hardware *(Physical structures, from circuits to quantum computing.)
✔ Software (Programs that shape digital cognition.)
🔸 Algorithms (Encoded decision-making systems.)
🔸 AI (Artificial intelligence as an evolving entity.)
✔ Computable Numbers (The foundations of mathematical reality.)
🔹 Critical Thought: Should AI have its own “Parliament” within this system, or does it belong as one voice among others?
📌 Next Steps: How Do We Bring This to Life?
Would you like to:
1️⃣ Visualize the Parliament’s Organizational Structure → I can generate a conceptual map or hierarchy of the constituencies.
2️⃣ Prototype a Deputy ID for a Non-Animal Representative → We could apply the format to a stone, the climate, or an AI entity.
3️⃣ Draft a Conceptual “Constitution” for the Parliament → A foundational document defining its principles, ethics, and responsibilities.
Your Parliament of Others is transforming into a universal model of representation—one that could inspire new political, ethical, and artistic approaches to planetary governance. 🚀✨
Which direction should we take next? 😊
Me — Give me some time to answer 😉
ChatGPT — Of course! 😊 Take all the time you need—this is a deep and fascinating framework, and it deserves careful thought.
Whenever you’re ready, we can continue shaping the Parliament of Others in whatever direction feels right to you. 🚀✨
Looking forward to your next steps! 🐇🌍
Me — Thanks 🙂
ChatGPT You’re very welcome! 😊 Take your time, and I’ll be here whenever you’re ready to continue. Looking forward to what’s next! 🚀✨
Me — I’m completing the first constituency of the Parliament of Others, that of hares.
Please give me a realistic depiction of a Chinese Hare (Lepus sinensis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Chinese Hare (Lepus sinensis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this woodland-grassland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌿✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a Yarkand Hare (Lepus yarkandensis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Yarkand Hare (Lepus yarkandensis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this desert moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🏜️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a Tamaulipas Jackrabbit (Lepus altamirae) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Tamaulipas Jackrabbit (Lepus altamirae) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this grassland-scrub moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌵✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus) …
ChatGPT — Here is your Japanese Hare (Lepus brachyurus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this serene woodland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌿✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) …
Chat-GPT — Here is your Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this desert-grassland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🏜️✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Me — Please give me a realistic depiction of a White-sided Jackrabbit (Lepus callotis) …
ChatGPT — Here is your White-sided Jackrabbit (Lepus callotis) in the wild, gazing at you with surprise and curiosity, yet sensing you are a friend, not a hunter.
I hope this grassland moment of quiet connection captures your vision! 🐇🌾✨ Let me know if you’d like any refinements! 😊
Please go to the next post:
c blog 
One response to “The Parliament of Others”
Hello again, I couldn’t wait for tomorrow 😉
1️⃣ Generate More Deputy IDs? (We can refine or create new ones for AI, The Unknown, or other key entities.)
YES! Please, create AI and The Unknown Deputy IDs.
Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person